|
|
To serve the needs of our clients, and in light of our strong antitrust background, we expanded the scope of our business litigation services to include antitrust litigation. Our approach to antitrust litigation incorporates our method of developing individualized, unique case strategies for case management with the goal of reducing litigation risks and enhancing the probability of satisfactory outcomes.
Specific cases:
- In Re Microsoft Corporation Antitrust Litigation (District of Maryland) (Co-Chair)
- In Re Commercial Explosives Antitrust Litigation (Multi-District Litigation)
- In Re Vitamins Antitrust Litigation, Procter & Gamble Company, et al. v. BASF Aktiengesellschaft, et al. (District of Columbia)
- Kentucky Speedway LLC v. NASCAR, et al. (Eastern District of Kentucky)
- Hamilton County Board of Commissioners v. National Football League, et al. (Southern District of Ohio)
- State of Ohio, Milk Antitrust Litigation (Co-Lead)
- In Re Choice Care Litigation (Southern District of Ohio)
- Forsyth v. Humana, Inc. (District of Nevada)
- Williams v. Duke Energy Corp. (Southern District of Ohio)
|
